This is warning during buildtime. If this 2 packages are fighting which will provide the library, then users of this library will get different one to RDEPENDS from shlibs code each time the poco* are finished building in different order.
I don't know if we have any poco users in our metadata, but making it deterministic is always good thing. On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> WARNING: poco-1.7.8-r0 do_package: poco-1.7.8 was registered as shlib > >> provider for libCppUnit.so.1, changing it to poco-cppunit-1.7.8 because > >> it was built later > > > > actually poco should not build a shared object at all since that > > should come from cppunit recipe. > > actually the library names are different. And move to make it part of > poco--cppunit is the right thing. What problems do you see ? package > upgrade ? > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
