On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa <[email protected]> wrote: > Khem Raj <[email protected]> writes: > >> what are main architectures targetted with crosswalk ? I think scope is >> important, since meta-browser supports, almost all oe-core supported >> architectures. including x86/arm/mips/ppc, any cross build patches are >> required in anycase, but architecture patches will be additional if you >> were only considering a subset of architectures. > > There's nothing Crosswalk-related in my Chromium recipe; it's in > meta-crosswalk simply due to a historical accident and the fact that I > haven't found a proper home for it so far. > > With that said, I've tested my builds with x86, x86-64, ARMv7 (IIRC > Chromium doesn't support earlier ARM processors) and aarch64. I think the update stopper for chromium on meta browser is the new build system (don't remember the name). To take this step and have a more recent version of chromium in meta-browser would be really great!
Andreas -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
