On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > If LSB isn't goal of oe-core, then why not move all this: > > OE qemux86-64@ ~/build/oe-core/openembedded-core $ find meta -name \*lsb\* > meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-dev.bb > meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-sdk.bb > meta/recipes-extended/lsb > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_pidofproc > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_start_daemon > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_log_message > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/0001-fix-lsb_release-to-work-with-busybox-head-and-find.patch > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_killproc > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.72.bb > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest_1.0.bb > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_4.1.bb > meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest > meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb > meta/lib/oe/__pycache__/lsb.cpython-35.pyc > meta/lib/oe/__pycache__/lsb.cpython-36.pyc > meta/lib/oe/lsb.pyc > meta/lib/oe/lsb.py > > together with libpng12, to some new meta-lsb layer, preferably outside > meta-oe repository as I already have enough of this stuff. >
A patch to remove them is good since you already found this out. If they get into a layer of its own can happen later when lsb interested devs chime in. > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Burton, Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 14 September 2017 at 14:49, Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux. >> intel.com> wrote: >> >>> On 09/14/2017 04:42 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> >>>> On 14 September 2017 at 11:33, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> LSB compliance isn't a goal of meta-oe as well, otherwise we'd need to >>>>> add Qt4 to meta-oe too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Touche. >>>> >>>> It still needs to go somewhere though... >>>> >>> >>> How about modifying the LSB tests to make the absence of libpng12 a >>> warning rather than an error? >>> >> >> Then it won't be doing a LSB test... The LSB is the LSB, we don't claim >> to support it, but there's a need for a libpng12 recipe for people who want >> to be close. Currently it's just this one recipe that I'm aware of that >> isn't already in a layer somewhere. >> >> Ross >> > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
