+Joe who will merge it to meta-networking maybe you meant show stopper as libtalloc failure not the whole OE world failing to parse because of waf-samba.bbclass (even if you don't build any recipes using it).
FWIW: I've also sent simple fix for that to oe-core a while ago: http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=jansa/master&id=71debaa06cb6f0d8996527e6d3bd6634508bd4a5 that's why it isn't failing for me, but it wasn't merged to oe-core and not sure if it ever will be. Regards, On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > I've merged the fix for parsing issues immediately after sending it (6 > days ago): > http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=2f7 > de931885c1b9e63c4e4238f0f7ad1388e8b6d > > So it shouldn't fail to parse for you if you use new enough oe-core (it > doesn't fail for me). > > waf.bbclass is still broken in rocko and master, but that's different > issue and not as fatal as missing get_waf_parallel_make function. > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:48 AM, Tim Orling <[email protected]. > com> wrote: > >> Still failing for me, which is a show stopper. :( >> >> > On Feb 21, 2018, at 5:36 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Any updates on this one yet? Thanks. >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 02:18:32PM -0800, Tim Orling wrote: >> >> Expediting the fix is greatly appreciated. >> >> >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> >> --Tim >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Joshua Watt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 21:55 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> >>>> Don't you want to update that one to use the new function from utils >> >>>> instead of re-introducing get_waf_parallel_make? >> >>> >> >>> .... yes. I guess I can do that now. It didn't exist when I wrote the >> >>> first version of this patch >> >>>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 9:18 PM, Joshua Watt <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 21:08 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: >> >>>>>> And now it will fail to parse as well: >> >>>>>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=ccd1142d >> >>>>>> 22b31ed85d8823b1bc9e11ccfd72b61f >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> removed get_waf_parallel_make from waf.bbclass, so now all waf- >> >>>>>> samba.bbclass users will fail to parse with: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2018-Feb >> >>>>> ruary/116701.html will fix that as well.... We probably need to >> >>>>> speed along that getting merged. >> >>>>> Armin can you help with that? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> This patch should resolve all of the waf issues that have been >> >>>>> discussed here, with exception of the one improvement proposed by >> >>>>> Denys. While it should probably be improved, I don't beleive it >> >>>>> actually affects any recipes (some please give me an example if I >> >>>>> am wrong). >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Sorry for the churn. Hopefull this will be better in the future >> >>>>> since waf and samba-waf are no longer tied together. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Joshua Watt >> >>>>>> bb.data_smart.ExpansionError: Failure expanding variable >> >>>>>> do_compile, expression was >> >>>>>> python ./buildtools/bin/waf ${@get_waf_parallel_make(d)} >> >>>>>> which triggered exception NameError: name >> >>>>>> 'get_waf_parallel_make' is not defined >> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail >> >>>>>> .com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Check this thread: >> >>>>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-commits/20 >> >>>>>>> 18-January/218460.html >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> but my patch wasn't merged: >> >>>>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018- >> >>>>>>> January/146974.html >> >>>>>>> only the one from Joshua. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> The original issue is still in rocko as well, the backported >> >>>>>>> waf change doesn't work and causes useless warning. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Either the "waf.bbclass: explicitly pass bindir and libdir if >> >>>>>>> supported" should be reverted in rocko or all fixes for this >> >>>>>>> should be backported to rocko once they are all in oe-core and >> >>>>>>> meta-oe master. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Regards, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:03 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix >> >>>>>>> .org> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:37:11PM -0600, Joshua Watt wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 15, 2018 17:42, "Denys Dmytriyenko" <[email protected] >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:30:06PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis >> >>>>>>>> @denix.org> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:20:49PM +0000, Tim Orling >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Then why did ‘sudo dnf install waf’ get me past the >> >>>>>>>> error above? And >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> why >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> does Fedora have a package for it? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/waf >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regardless, something broke. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I thought so too. As waf.bbclass from oe-core looks for >> >>>>>>>> waf binary in >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> the root >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> of the source package, I looked inside libtalloc 2.1.9 >> >>>>>>>> and 2.1.10 and >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> neither >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> of them have any "waf" files at the root. How was it >> >>>>>>>> working before? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> What >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> broke? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> its using waf-samba.bbclass, there is a patch floating >> >>>>>>>> for that >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/148046/ >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> So, it will fix libtalloc, but some other packages that >> >>>>>>>> still use >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> waf.bbclass >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> will keep on failing with an exception? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> They shouldn't. I tested all the ones I could find. The way >> >>>>>>>> waf-samba uses >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> waf is more of the exception than the rule.... Most >> >>>>>>>> projects will follow >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> the waf.bbclass pattern of a wscript and waf in $S, but we >> >>>>>>>> can probably >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> parameterize it if necessary. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Do you know of a specific recipe that fails? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> No, but as Andre said here earlier, it should be more >> >>>>>>>> forgiving when ${S}/waf >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> is not available or at least give a proper error message >> >>>>>>>> instead of dumping a >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> cryptic exception stack... >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> In other words, before this waf.bbclass change in oe-core it >> >>>>>>>> was handling such >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> situation just fine and there was a warning "Unable to >> >>>>>>>> execute waf --version, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> exit code 127". Now it never reaches that code and just >> >>>>>>>> throws an exception. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 3:16 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacke >> >>>>>>>> [email protected]> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 23:10 +0000, Tim Orling wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seeing the same and trying to figure it out. Also, >> >>>>>>>> seems there is >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> no >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> recipe >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for waf-native, so it becomes a new required host >> >>>>>>>> tool. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There is no "waf" tool, so a "waf-native" tool >> >>>>>>>> doesn't make sense... >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's not how waf works. Each project has their own >> >>>>>>>> copy of the waf >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> program, it's not something the host has to provide. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:57 PM Denys Dmytriyenko >> >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm getting below stack dump building libtalloc >> >>>>>>>> 2.1.10 in master. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Works >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine in >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rocko with libtalloc 2.1.9. I need it for cifs- >> >>>>>>>> utils. I'm not >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> familiar with >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waf, any help? Thanks. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR: libtalloc-2.1.10-r0 do_configure: Error >> >>>>>>>> executing a python >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in exec_python_func() autogenerated: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The stack trace of python calls that resulted in >> >>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception/failure >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File: 'exec_python_func() autogenerated', >> >>>>>>>> lineno: 2, function: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <module> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0001: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** 0002:waf_preconfigure(d) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0003: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File: '/OE/master/sources/oe- >> >>>>>>>> core/meta/classes/waf.bbclass', >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lineno: 34, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function: waf_preconfigure >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0030: from distutils.version import >> >>>>>>>> StrictVersion >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0031: subsrcdir = d.getVar('S') >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0032: wafbin = os.path.join(subsrcdir, >> >>>>>>>> 'waf') >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0033: try: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** 0034: result = >> >>>>>>>> subprocess.check_output([wafbin, ' >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --version'], >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cwd=subsrcdir, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0035: version = result.decode('utf- >> >>>>>>>> 8').split()[1] >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0036: if StrictVersion(version) >= >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> StrictVersion("1.8.7"): >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0037: d.setVar("WAF_EXTRA_CONF", >> >>>>>>>> " >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --bindir=${bindir} >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --libdir=${libdir}") >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0038: except >> >>>>>>>> subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File: '/usr/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py', >> >>>>>>>> lineno: 626, function: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check_output >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0622: # empty string. That is >> >>>>>>>> maintained here for >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backwards >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0623: kwargs['input'] = '' if >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kwargs.get('universal_newlines', >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> False) else b'' >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0624: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0625: return run(*popenargs, >> >>>>>>>> stdout=PIPE, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> timeout=timeout, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check=True, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** 0626: **kwargs).stdout >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0627: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0628: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0629:class CompletedProcess(object): >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0630: """A process that has finished >> >>>>>>>> running. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File: '/usr/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py', >> >>>>>>>> lineno: 693, function: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0689: if 'stdin' in kwargs: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0690: raise ValueError('stdin >> >>>>>>>> and input arguments >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may not >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both be used.') >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0691: kwargs['stdin'] = PIPE >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0692: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** 0693: with Popen(*popenargs, **kwargs) >> >>>>>>>> as process: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0694: try: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0695: stdout, stderr = >> >>>>>>>> process.communicate(input, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeout=timeout) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0696: except TimeoutExpired: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0697: process.kill() >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File: '/usr/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py', >> >>>>>>>> lineno: 947, function: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> __init__ >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0943: >> >>>>>>>> startupinfo, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creationflags, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shell, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0944: >> >>>>>>>> p2cread, p2cwrite, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0945: >> >>>>>>>> c2pread, c2pwrite, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0946: >> >>>>>>>> errread, errwrite, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** 0947: >> >>>>>>>> restore_signals, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start_new_session) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0948: except: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0949: # Cleanup if the child >> >>>>>>>> failed starting. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0950: for f in filter(None, >> >>>>>>>> (self.stdin, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self.stdout, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self.stderr)): >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0951: try: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File: '/usr/lib/python3.5/subprocess.py', >> >>>>>>>> lineno: 1551, function: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _execute_child >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1547: # The >> >>>>>>>> error must be >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> from >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chdir(cwd). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1548: >> >>>>>>>> err_msg += ': ' + >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repr(cwd) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1549: else: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1550: >> >>>>>>>> err_msg += ': ' + >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repr(orig_executable) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** 1551: raise >> >>>>>>>> child_exception_type(errno_ >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> num, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> err_msg) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1552: raise >> >>>>>>>> child_exception_type(err_msg) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1553: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1554: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1555: def _handle_exitstatus(self, >> >>>>>>>> sts, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _WIFSIGNALED=os.WIFSIGNALED, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exception: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such >> >>>>>>>> file or >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> directory: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '/OE/master/build/tmp-glibc/work/armv7ahf-neon- >> >>>>>>>> oe-linux- >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gnueabi/libtalloc/2.1.10-r0/talloc-2.1.10/waf' >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR: libtalloc-2.1.10-r0 do_configure: >> >>>>>>>> Function failed: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waf_preconfigure >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /OE/master/build/tmp-glibc/work/armv7ahf-neon- >> >>>>>>>> oe-linux- >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gnueabi/libtalloc/2.1.10- >> >>>>>>>> r0/temp/log.do_configure.52699 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR: Task >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (/OE/master/sources/meta-openembedded/meta- >> >>>>>>>> networking/recipes- >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> support/libtalloc/libtalloc_2.1.10.bb:do_configure) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed with exit code '1' >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/o >> >>>>>>>> penembedded-devel >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembe >> >>>>>>>> dded-devel >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded >> >>>>>>>> -devel >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [email protected] >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-d >> >>>>>>>> evel >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> -- >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> >>> >> >> -- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> > -- >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Openembedded-devel mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >> > > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
