On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:05 AM Otavio Salvador < [email protected]> wrote:
> Em ter, 24 de jul de 2018 16:25, Henning Heinold < > [email protected]> escreveu: > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:55:34AM +0100, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > Em ter, 24 de jul de 2018 08:33, Richard Leitner < > > > [email protected]> escreveu: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > finally I have another question regarding the meta-java layer :-) > > > > > > > > Do we have some kind of bug-tracker? > > > > > > > > If no: I would really love to see one for meta-java. > > > > What are our possibilities here? YP Bugzilla? GitHub? others? > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > We recently passed the review process of meta-qt5 to github and it has > > been > > > much better this using the patchwork. > > > > > > Maybe we could consider the possibility of moving meta-java there and > > make > > > the yp.org a mirror so we use the issues, PR and all resources it > offers > > > (Travis as well). > > > > The question is under which github space that should happen and who has > > the control over it. > > > > We can make a organization as we did for qt5 or it might be under OSSystems > umbrella. > I’d vote for new organization. Just make sure to update the layer index. > > > > > Bye Henning > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
