On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:04 AM Brendan Kerrigan <brendank...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sounds good, I hadn't seen that. Should the existing lcms recipe be renamed > to lcms2? Most distros seem to package it as such and it'd also simplify > the recipe a bit (the PN would align with the tarball and source directory > name). >
as long as we maintain upgrade path for binary feeds I would think its ok. > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:23 AM Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 16:42, brendank310 <brendank...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +inherit autotools pkgconfig distro_features_check > > > > distro_features_check isn't being used. > > > > But mainly, just update the existing recipe. > > > > Ross > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
