Yeah the recipes still using autotools were not utilizing meson at the time the work was started. If some of the projects have migrated in the mean time, it makes sense to do that work now. At this point I think it makes sense to split this into two pull requests, the first set of patches will uprev existing recipes (e.g. lcms, dconf to support native, etc), and a follow on reflow of the additional recipes for supporting gnome-shell with the comments addressed. I expect to be able to post a v2 by early next week as I have other commitments that have taken priority. Thanks for all the comments so far.
Brendan On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 6:34 PM Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:41 PM brendank310 <brendank...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This adds gnome3/gnome-shell support (and required dependencies) > > to meta-gnome. > > > > Please review the following changes for suitability for inclusion. If > you have > > any objections or suggestions for improvement, please respond to the > patches. If > > you agree with the changes, please provide your Acked-by. > > > > The following changes since commit > f1511d254632a34c1deb51f4bf8b8c21e7423f51: > > > Thanks for doing this! Hope to get it build/run-tested soon - > currently I am shaping my layers for thud and poky-users. > > Did not look much into details but I have one question: Many recipes > still use autotools and GNOME's target will be meson. Is there a > reason that most of the recipes use autotools? > > Regards > > Andreas > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel