On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 9:29 AM André Draszik <g...@andred.net> wrote:
> From: André Draszik <andre.dras...@jci.com> > > This recipe here actually depends on Java7 upwards, not Java2 upwards, > so state that dependency correctly using the newly introduced (virtual) > RPROVIDES of the OpenJDK8/OpenJRE8 recipes. > > At the same time, we can remove hard-coded references to openjdk-8 and > openjre-8, and thusly make the build more flexible. > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.dras...@jci.com> > --- > .../ca-certificates-java_20180516.bb | 10 ++-------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes-core/ca-certificates-java/ > ca-certificates-java_20180516.bb b/recipes-core/ca-certificates-java/ > ca-certificates-java_20180516.bb > index a2d7abd..2ae7352 100644 > --- a/recipes-core/ca-certificates-java/ca-certificates-java_20180516.bb > +++ b/recipes-core/ca-certificates-java/ca-certificates-java_20180516.bb > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ DEPENDS = "virtual/javac-native fastjar-native" > Should this DEPEND on virtual/java7-sdk-native instead? # We can't use virtual/javac-native, because that would create a > # keystore that can't be read on the target (as virtual/javac-native > # usually is either too old, or plain incompatible with this) > -PACKAGE_WRITE_DEPS += "openjdk-8-native" > +PACKAGE_WRITE_DEPS += "virtual/java7-runtime-native" > Would you still need the PACKAGE_WRITE_DEPS if the DEPENDS above was changed? I thought virtual/javac-native was "too old" because it was reserved for the bootstrap process, so I've been considering it as a special case. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
