On 5/1/19 9:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 08:41:03AM -0700, Armin Kuster wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <[email protected]> >> >> [v2] >> bump bitbake to warrior version >> --- >> README | 2 +- >> meta-filesystems/README | 12 ++++++------ >> meta-gnome/README | 10 +++++----- >> meta-initramfs/README | 8 ++++---- >> meta-multimedia/README | 10 +++++----- >> meta-networking/MAINTAINERS | 32 +++----------------------------- >> meta-networking/README | 6 +++--- >> meta-oe/README | 8 ++++---- >> meta-perl/README | 10 ++++------ >> meta-python/README | 12 +++++------- >> meta-webserver/README | 8 ++++---- >> meta-xfce/README | 10 +++++----- >> 12 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/README b/README >> index 7318f09..881115e 100644 >> --- a/README >> +++ b/README >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ >> Collection of layers for the OE-core universe >> >> -Main layer maintainer: Khem Raj <[email protected]> >> +Warrior maintainer: Armin Kuster <[email protected]> >> >> This repository is a collection of layers to suppliment OE-Core >> with additional packages, Each layer have designated maintainer >> diff --git a/meta-filesystems/README b/meta-filesystems/README >> index 87cb685..842da13 100644 >> --- a/meta-filesystems/README >> +++ b/meta-filesystems/README >> @@ -10,30 +10,30 @@ Dependencies >> This layer depends on: >> >> URI: git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake >> - branch: master >> + branch: 1.42 > To be clear, where is 1.42 coming from? > $ git checkout warrior > Switched to branch 'warrior' > Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/warrior'. > $ git grep BB_MIN_VER > meta/classes/sanity.bbclass: minversion = d.getVar('BB_MIN_VERSION') > meta/conf/sanity.conf:BB_MIN_VERSION = "1.39.1" How is this a problem of meta-openembedded? its a core and bitbake issue.
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?h=warrior&id=0c3423aae935c36e59d15d8bb60d7826cebc4e03 https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/log/?h=1.42 > > To be clear, I'm _not_ a fan of saying we need to go that old > (especially since there's no CI done with that version) but I am saying > we should be consistent with the code. You are helping make a case for removing the reference to what bitbake version meta-filesystems want as its the only layer that identified it needed bitbake. The other layers in meta-openembedded don't list it. I will send v3 to remove any reference to bitbake. - armin >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
