Hi Armin
On 9/10/19 3:06 PM, akuster808 wrote:
Stefan,
On 9/10/19 2:49 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
From: Stefan Agner <[email protected]>
Add recipe for libfuse version 3 series. Follow the scheme other
distributions use and create a new recipe with 3 in its name.
To avoid conflict with the fuse (2) recipe this recipe does not
provide init scripts/configuration files which automatically load
the fuse kernel driver.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <[email protected]>
This recipe appears to already exist in meta-filesystem
https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-filesystems/recipes-support/fuse/fuse_2.9.9.bb
Is this a all together a different Major version that is not compatible
with the one above? or should we just update the old one?
These are different revisions which can be installed together see [1]
I think best solution is as proposed where both revisions can live
together, we don't want to force fuse2 users to fuse3 since it could
mean quite a bit of unplanned work. Eventually we might drop fuse2 maybe
in 3.1+ releases if all users of fuse in OE have moved over to fuse3
[1]
https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/blob/master/ChangeLog.rst#libfuse-300-2016-12-08
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
