Hi,

My comments are in line.

On 29/04/2020 13:02, Richard Leitner wrote:
Hi Robert,
sorry for the delay.

No prob. I know what it means to be busy ;)


I pushed the "g0hl1n/jdk8-fix" branch to the meta-java git repository.
It is a temporary test branch and it should fix the GCC version
dependencies (as long as you have GCC >= v6).

It would be great if you could do a quick test and give me feedback ;-)

You mean that should work against dunfell?

I will give it a try.

... for the archiver issue I think I might be able to figure out in Python who called the function and react accordingly. Will have a look at this as well as time permits.


thanks & regards;rl

Regards,

Robert


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:53:17PM +0200, robert.berger.oe.devel wrote:
Hi,

I tried to add support for a host gcc-9 and suggested this patch[1]

[1] 
https://github.com/RobertBerger/meta-java/commit/898a0ae33c9102387aae2e3427a007e3935e663e

and, as per your suggestion, since it restricts the host compiler to >= gcc9
I added "-Wno-unknown-warning".

https://github.com/RobertBerger/meta-java/commit/3d8ae5afb639ec7abcc48f15c74b42b373863c57

... but it does not build:

https://pastebin.com/B1nxHcPH

cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-Wno-unknown-warning’
[-Werror]

That's my host gcc:

pokyuser@3a469e7032d9:/workdir$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 9.2.1-17ubuntu1~16.04) 9.2.1 20191102
Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

pokyuser@3a469e7032d9:/workdir$

Please advise.

Regards,

Robert

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#84138): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/84138
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/72312277/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/leave/8024792/1994799631/xyzzy
  [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to