That would be fine as well, but would need protobuf to be moved as well. I came across this just because of running yocto-check-layer on meta-oe (without meta-python).
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:59 PM Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > perhaps python3-protobuf should be in oe-core rather. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:28 AM Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > * depends on python3-protobuf from meta-python: > > * fixes: > > ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'python3-protobuf' (but > meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nanopb/nanopb_0.4.3.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise > requires it) > > NOTE: Runtime target 'python3-protobuf' is unbuildable, removing... > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['python3-protobuf'] > > ERROR: Required build target 'meta-world-pkgdata' has no buildable > providers. > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['meta-world-pkgdata', > 'nanopb', 'python3-protobuf'] > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > > --- > > .../meta-python}/recipes-devtools/nanopb/nanopb_0.4.3.bb | 0 > > 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > rename meta-oe/{ => dynamic-layers/meta-python}/recipes-devtools/nanopb/ > nanopb_0.4.3.bb (100%) > > > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nanopb/nanopb_0.4.3.bb > b/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/meta-python/recipes-devtools/nanopb/ > nanopb_0.4.3.bb > > similarity index 100% > > rename from meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nanopb/nanopb_0.4.3.bb > > rename to meta-oe/dynamic-layers/meta-python/recipes-devtools/nanopb/ > nanopb_0.4.3.bb > > -- > > 2.27.0 > > > > > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#88218): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/88218 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/78662042/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
