On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 1:56 PM akuster808 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 4/24/21 3:36 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Please take > > > https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=b5ad9c011db2581cc84e5daa139acf73a0f6f5c0 > > as well to fix > > > https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?h=hardknott&id=98a26903f770aa8698770817bdaf6175367917e1 > > merged in previous PR. > > Hardknott already has that commit. Was this meant for Gatesgarth? > I don't see b5ad9c011db2581cc84e5daa139acf73a0f6f5c0 in hardknott nor in hardknott-next: https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/log/?h=hardknott-next&qt=grep&q=tbb And in master it's between the last 2 commits you did cherry-pick for hardknott in this round, so I don't understand why this one was skipped. It's not needed in gatesgarth, because the tbb upgrade which dropped in PE wasn't merged to gatesgarth.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#91065): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/91065 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/82330983/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
