If you need it just for some experiments than feel free to use: https://github.com/shr-project/meta-python2/commits/jansa/master/ which I've already updated (for built time benchmark which historically included qtwebengine as well https://github.com/shr-project/test-oe-build-time).
But for anything more serious work with your customer to switch to something more supported, there are still minor upgrades to meta-qt5 (last in https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/pull/556), but it's a dead end and switch to something else should have higher priority than switch to scarthgap (e.g. switching to meta-qt6). Cheers, On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 3:15 PM Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > > Support both kirkstone and scarthgap as that seems to work well. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> > --- > conf/layer.conf | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf > index 38ef579..0f228ca 100644 > --- a/conf/layer.conf > +++ b/conf/layer.conf > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ LAYERVERSION_meta-python2 = "1" > > LAYERDEPENDS_meta-python2 = "core openembedded-layer" > > -LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_meta-python2 = "kirkstone" > +LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_meta-python2 = "kirkstone scarthgap" > > LICENSE_PATH += "${LAYERDIR}/licenses" > > -- > 2.43.0 >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#109966): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/109966 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/105535514/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
