The new fitimage.bbclass was introduced via GitHub pullrequest [1]. There was a small force-push which implemented a prefix for the names of the configuration nodes to harmonize the class with the mechanism found in OE-core (see [2] & [3]). Unfortunately it was forgotten to also apply that prefix to the name of the configuration to utilize by default - fix that.
[1] https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/pull/882 [2] https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/pull/882#issuecomment-2402218973 [3] https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/compare/0773f63e829b399a3e87cee03b009846c48b8429..32e7947154ea10e17f5db95d6bfaaf5074663fc7 Signed-off-by: Ulrich Ölmann <u.oelm...@pengutronix.de> --- meta-oe/classes/fitimage.bbclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/classes/fitimage.bbclass b/meta-oe/classes/fitimage.bbclass index 78e30eca3395..ebd034883b97 100644 --- a/meta-oe/classes/fitimage.bbclass +++ b/meta-oe/classes/fitimage.bbclass @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ def fitimage_emit_section_config(d, fd, dtb, kernelcount, ramdiskcount, setupcou if bootscriptid: conf_desc += ", u-boot script" if dtbcount == 1: - conf_default = d.getVar('FITIMAGE_DEFAULT_CONFIG', True) or dtb + conf_default = d.getVar('FITIMAGE_DEFAULT_CONFIG', True) or f'{conf_prefix}{dtb}' if conf_default: fd.write(f'\t\tdefault = "{conf_default}";\n') -- 2.39.5
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#112936): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/112936 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/109039584/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-devel+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
