+10000
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Raphael Valyi <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, > > not everybody is using OpenERP for kidding. If you look at the integrators > successful with OpenERP, most of them are not just downloading modules > around: they are creating synergies between modules authors, creating new > branches of modules to comply with new OpenERP versions (v7?), > localizations, other modules... People are reporting bugs and proposing > enhancements, extracting common abstractions, merging similar modules... > OpenERP has never been something mature with minor evolutions. It's a > moving target instead... > That can only work when a module has a project home somewhere Github, > Launchpad etc.. that serious people can work with. > > Unless I missed something, I can not find these relevant information > (repository page, main branch for serie, project page) in the new Apps > website. Take Akretion, we made over 100 OpenERP modules, www.akretion.comis > certainly not the best hub for all of them, some are on some Launchpad > community branches, some are isolated on Launchpad, some are on Github, the > relevant thing is to pass that information, else sorry to say it but it's > just one more useless thing people will end up making parody web pages > about again. > > Take new version 7 release: I would say even 6 months after v7 has been > officially released, may be 75% of the extra modules commonly used on v6.1 > are still not ported to v7. That means things don't happen magically > overnight. Modules get migrated if people identify easily what are the > issues, where to report bugs and propose their contributions. People are > also encouraged to visit project modules before picking ones, so they can > evaluate if development seems serious, if there are tests, how frequently > the repo is updated, if there are contributions, peer review etc.. > How can one think the fuel of the free eco-system powering most of OpenERP > modules is just a detail? > If the central hub OpenERP SA don't emphasis how things work in first > place, then yes, you can expect public will keep understanding nothing > about open source, will keep thinking things all come free magically at > every new release no matter how thing change and because they won't > understand how it works behind, they will not fund it and the eco-system > will keep struggling. > > Sorry to be harsh about that, but I cannot understand how you guys didn't > think about that. If that information is missing, then Google will keep > being a much better apps hub than apps unfortunately. > > > My 2 cents. > > > > -- > Raphaël Valyi > Founder and consultant > http://twitter.com/rvalyi <http://twitter.com/#!/rvalyi> > +55 21 2516 2954 > www.akretion.com > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Eric Caudal > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> The v6apps.openerp.com has disappeared: I can understand the need to >> switch to the new repository but one side effect is that all current link >> in the web are not redirected to the new repository... That is a huge loss >> in terms of knowledge base and legacy maintenance. >> >> Would it be possible to keep the old repository until the new repository >> is fully populated (let's say 2 or 3 month) and have a redirect later? >> >> >> Eric Caudal*CEO* >> --*Elico Corporation, Shanghai branchOpenERP Premium Certified Training >> Partner * >> Cell: + 86 186 2136 1670 >> Office: + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37 >> Skype: [email protected]http://www.elico-corp.com >> >> [image: Elico Corp] >> On 13/08/2013 23:38, Olivier Dony wrote: >> >> On 08/13/2013 11:35 AM, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote: >> >> b) I want to know how to manage the community branches repositories... I >> can >> register them only using my Camptocamp account/login which is obviously >> not the >> purpose at all ! Can we have a login for the OCA in order to manage the >> community work and repository here ? It'll be good, so all community >> branches >> can be managed through that portal. Most of our work is currently >> released in >> the community repo.. >> >> >> I think it makes sense to register OCA branches under a generic OCA >> account that can be managed by the OCA core reviewers team. I will send the >> account info to the ~openerp-community-reviewer members. >> In any case you can also register them with your account and we can later >> transfer the ownership. >> >> >> c) Searching for camptocamp only display me 9 modules... I think >> something >> wrong about the search or I missed something, do you know what ? >> (example, the >> account_financial_report_webkit appear if I search by name, but not if I >> enter >> Camptocamp...).. It's very confusing. >> >> >> There was an issue with the author-based search (in the front-end only), >> it should now be fixed. >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
