Title: Eric CAUDAL
Hi Ana,
Thanks for your input.
I like the idea of fund raising per community (basically what has
been done for Magento).
Nevertheless, I think there are already available many open tools
(lp, apps.openerp.com etc) where people can already freely
contribute. I dont think we need to add another one that will add
few value to the existing tools.
I would rather have a clear recognition of the difference made by
the community reviewer projects and get them more visible on the
OpenERP universe.
Unrated list of modules are welcome and necessary but end-users
will best remember a few sets of useful and workable modules
rather than thousands of modules of uneven quality that they
cannot test one by one.
This is why we need to maintain quality modules and set of modules
and advertise them to improve current OpenERP image and
visibility.
Eric Caudal
CEO
--
Elico Corporation, Shanghai branch
OpenERP Premium Certified Training Partner
Cell: + 86 186 2136 1670
Office: + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37
Skype: elico.corp
[email protected]
http://www.elico-corp.com
On 07/09/2013 20:29, Ana Juaristi wrote:
HI everybody:
My opinion is that fundraising should be made for
each community project.
It can be very complicated founding something that
people is contributing. Maybe a little contribution
could be needed to mantain the website or any
administrative tasks but it would be like paying a
marketing site more than contributing on modules.
I think that community should be totally open and
noone can fix if something have got enough quality to
be included or not. For any administrative validation
task you include on ecosystem more difficult will be
mantaining it, more complex would be people to
contribute and that's not the objetive of community
modules.
I would prefere having a totally open site where people
can download any module, even if it's not documented,
even if it's not certified, even if it has not quality
and... let people using it including it's value with
their comments, votes and so on like hotel reserving
websites or any other people mantained site.
As much valued is a module more people will use it, so
more services will sell the contributor so more visibility
will obtain with modules.
On technical side, as much documented, much clear code,
much used module more visibility will obtain, so more
people will use it, so it will be more tested, so more
valuation will obtain.
On the other side, if someone has got a very good idea about
a new blueprint / functionality a new foundrising project
could be created to obtain founds to realize that project.
I don't think so community modules should be fiscalized very
much. We need focusing about a place where community can
download, comment, report bugs, contribute and value other
people contributions. I will agree on contributing in a
crowdfunding project to realize this but I don't see very
clear contributing to something to cover costs that are not
clear yet.
Thank you very much:
Ana
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
|
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
