Hi Pedro,
I'm as well glad to see the new module and their improved quality, I completely agree :) ! I see tests, I see better coding standard respected, I see very good opinion and discussion, and that's very encouraging ! Regarding the .pot files and direct commit, I personally think it's better to keep the porcess with MP even for that. Review and merge on those MP will be easy and fast, one per project to setup all missing, that's sounds reasonnable to me. What do you think ? Regards, Joël On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Pedro Manuel Baeza Romero < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, community, > > I'm glad to see how community repositories are growing and v7 modules are > getting very good quality through peer review. Thank you to all the people > that are contributing to this. > > One remaining task to do with these repositories is to make available > translations easily via Launchpad Rosetta, and allow people with no > technical knowledge to contribute to translations. For this task, we need > to have at least one pot template file for each module. We are requiring it > on new MPs, but there are a lot of modules already there. > > That's why I'm sending this message, to ask for permissions to normalize > this situation generating pot files for these modules and making direct > commits to avoid the delay and saturation of MPs. > > What do you think about this? > > Regards. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- *camptocamp* INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS *Joël Grand-Guillaume* Division Manager Business Solutions +41 21 619 10 28 www.camptocamp.com
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
