On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Yannick Buron <[email protected]>wrote:
> Dear OpenERP Community, > > As we can see on launchpad, theses days a new saas-3 branch has been > created by OpenERP SA, following their process described here : > http://help.openerp.com/question/36712/what-is-the- > difference-between-trunk-saas-1-and-saas-2-versions-in-launchpad/. > > My concern is, I need to use a feature which is actually only available in > the saas branch, the recurring invoicing. I'm using actually the OCB > branchs for this project. > > I'd like to know if the publication of this saas-3 means that the stable > 7.0 will also be updated, either with the code from saas-2 branch or > saas-3. In general, is the position of OpenERP SA to update the stable > branch with features from saas from time to time or do we have to wait for > the next major version (here V8) to get the early features which are in > Saas? > > Thank you for your opinions, following them I'll decide either to go on > Saas branch or wait for stable 7.0 (and then upgrade to OCB branch when > it'll be updated). If you know a good community module which allow the > recurring invoices (And please, not subscription module :) ), this could > also allow me to stay on OCB branch. > > Best Regards, > Yannick Buron. Hello Yannick, during this period of time when OpenERP trunk is said to be too unstable to be deployed outside of a SaaS, my advise is to use git-subtree to extract key features as individual modules that can be backported alone without too much effort (pre-pended in your addons-path then). For instance, I think this is absolutely the case with recurring invoice while it wouldn't be reasonnable for quant based stock management. I explained the idea and gave 2 examples here of such backport. Please don't hesitate to suggest pull request if you see room for improvement or re-synch with upstream. https://lists.launchpad.net/openerp-community/msg04122.html Again, I'm all behind sticking with bzr with OCA and core of OpenERP, right now, it's just that I think git is so much more appropriate for these synchronized extractions. Regards. -- Raphaël Valyi Founder and consultant http://twitter.com/rvalyi <http://twitter.com/#!/rvalyi> +55 21 2516 2954 www.akretion.com
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
