Yannick, Ok, you're right.
Logistic, logistics, ... not easy to guess Most of us are not semantic expert. The simplest could be the better, If a non expert, like me, define the name of a new repository, singular and plural form could come back again in few months It's just an opinion Thanks David BEAL Akretion 2014-06-27 14:39 GMT+02:00 Yannick Vaucher <[email protected]>: > David, > > Guewen seems right on logistics. > Logistics not logistic if you want to talk about stock management. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistics > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic > > > For reports I proposed the most used version though I'm not against > removing plurals would make things simple. > > Cheers, > > PS: res_groups as well :-/ > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:28 PM, David Beal <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Guewen and all, >> >> +1 to have better names >> >> +1 to remove management/mgmt and addons >> >> But Guewen say : >> >> >> Also, logistics takes a final 's': >>> stock-logistics-warehouse >>> stock-logistics-tracking >>> stock-logistics-reports >>> stock-logistics-flows >>> stock-logistics-barcode >> >> >> 1/ I don't think we must add 's' to logistic. >> May be i'm wrong but isn't it 'report' of logistic kind (or >> stock-logistic type), then report must be plural but not logistic. >> If plural must be define could be >> stock-logistic-warehouses >> stock-logistic-flows >> >> 2/ in fact isn't it easier to avoid plural : all concept in the >> repository are 'collection of' (warehouse, report, partner, etc) >> In a database table name have no plural (except res_users ;'-( ) >> >> >> >> >> David BEAL >> Akretion >> Odoo Development - Integration >> +33 (0)6 67 22 86 89 >> +33 (0)4 82 53 84 60 >> >> >> 2014-06-27 13:08 GMT+02:00 Guewen Baconnier < >> [email protected]>: >> >>> Hello Yannick, >>> >>> Only the owners of the OCA's project on GitHub (so the Board's >>> members) have the rights to rename the repositories. >>> Renaming a repository implies to: >>> - rename it on GitHub >>> - change the link on odoo-community.org >>> - change the mapping for the migration >>> >>> But you are right, we must do it right now when nobody is using them yet. >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Yannick Vaucher >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hello dear community, >>> > >>> > I think we could take the opportunity to improve a bit our oca github >>> > repositories by renaming some of them to make them to fix some >>> > inconsistencies. >>> > >>> > For exemple, branch for reports are named report or reports >>> > I would suggest that as for 'tools' we use plural for reports >>> > >>> > account-financial-report >> account-financial-reports >>> > account-invoice-report >> account-invoice-reports >>> > sale-reports >>> > stock-logistic-report >> stock-logistic-reports >>> > manufacture-reports >>> > >>> >>> +1 >>> Also, logistics takes a final 's': >>> stock-logistics-warehouse >>> stock-logistics-tracking >>> stock-logistics-reports >>> stock-logistics-flows >>> stock-logistics-barcode >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > An other one is for management. Sometimes it is mgmt and sometimes >>> > management. >>> > My suggestion, use always mgmt instead of management. >>> > Other question is this term always necessary ? >>> >>> +1 >>> I would not be against the removal of -mgmt: >>> contract >>> commission >>> department >>> ... >>> >>> > >>> > contract-management >> contract-mgmt >>> > commission-mgmt >>> > crm-mgmt >>> > department-mgmt >>> > edition-mgmt >> * >>> > hotel-management-system >> * >>> > hr-mgmt >>> > manufacture-mgmt >> manufacture ? >>> > mgmtsystem >> mgmt-system >>> > partner-contact-management >> partner-contact-mgmt >>> > program-mgmt >>> > rma-mgmt >>> > travel-mgmt >> * >>> > >>> > (*) see bellow vertical integration >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Is "addons" necessary? We knows those branches are for addons right? >>> > >>> > e-commerce-addons >> e-commerce >>> > geospatial-addons >> geospatial >>> > knowledge-addons >> knowledge >>> > banking-addons >> banking >>> > ngo-addons >> * >>> > web-addons >>> >>> + 1 to remove -addons >>> >>> > >>> > (*) see bellow vertical integration >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > * Vertical Integrations >>> > Shouldn't we keep a keyword for vertical integration branches? >>> > to mean it aims a complete solution, we could add odoo before it >>> > >>> > hotel-management-system >> odoo-hotel >>> > construction >> odoo-construction >>> > medical >> odoo-medical >>> > isp >> odoo-isp >>> > edition-mgmt >> odoo-edition >>> > ngo-addons >> odoo-ngo >>> > travel-mgmt >> odoo-travel >>> >>> Maybe. No opinion here. >>> >>> See you >>> Guewen >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >> >> > > > -- > Yannick Vaucher > Business Solutions Software Developer > > Camptocamp SA > PSE A, CH-1015 Lausanne > Phone: +41 21 619 10 30 > Office: +41 21 619 10 10 > http://www.camptocamp.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
