> CPA was having case like, in notebook, one of the page was invisible, and in > that hidden page, one field was required. So CPA did like, if page is > invisible, then required field will be disabled so that value for required > field will not pass.
> But that field is required so value for that field is also necessary. OK, so cpa's patch should be removed because it really broke stuff (though it started from a good intention) is that right? > I think, this problem should be solved from addons side ? no ?? > If field or page is invisible then what is the use of required for that field > ? Yes, sounds about right, if an addon creates a field which is both required and invisible then it's a bug in the addon. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-dev/openobject-client-web/trunk-bug-723006-jra/+merge/54192 Your team OpenERP R&D Team is subscribed to branch lp:~openerp-dev/openobject-client-web/trunk-bug-723006-jra. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-dev-web Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-dev-web More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
