Il giorno mar, 16/03/2010 alle 19.28 -0300, Raphaël Valyi ha scritto: > I agree 100% not using the SQLAlchemy branch the way it is: it has > been done in the dark with no peer review (what quality would you > expect then?) and it adds some overhead indeed.
i've never thought at the -sa branches as a real opportunity, just because of what you previously said. but i've always considered sqlalchemy as a possible replacement for the openobject's ORM. sqlalchemy has a community and future. we can start a refactoring of our orm whenever we want if it's a matter of performance, but we have to be very sure sqlalchemy (the python module, not the openerp branch) isn't good enough (to not waste time and contributions from other communities) -- Davide Corio email: davide.corio<at>domsense.com web: http://www.domsense.com _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-expert-framework Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-expert-framework More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
