On 28/08/2012 14:01, P. Christeas wrote: > On Tuesday 28 August 2012, Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique > Numérigraphe wrote: >> Le 21/08/2012 12:34, P. Christeas a écrit : >>> On Tuesday 21 August 2012, you wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Imo the solution would be the pass a browse_record_list instead of a ids >>>> to every functions.... >>> Welcome to the "pg84-next" series: >>> https://github.com/xrg/openerp-server/commit/27fc3bf5ff94ab797d0e145a3e5 >>> >>> works really well, ever since. >> Was this proposed for merging? If not, maybe it's time to do.. > It has been, 1.5 years ago. Rejected, like most of my patches. > > It was more important for OpenERP SA. to push integrators into constantly > porting their modules (and thus pay migration fees) than actually improve the > framework for them. >
Any justification was given at that time? The patch looks simple and clear to me. I could be missing possible issues that could be caused by this, of course. -- Alexandre Fayolle Chef de Projet Tel : + 33 (0)4 79 26 57 94 Camptocamp France SAS Savoie Technolac, BP 352 73377 Le Bourget du Lac Cedex http://www.camptocamp.com _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-expert-framework Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-expert-framework More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
