And XMP is more or less just a big blob of XML. (I normally despise XML for the bloat, but in this case, it's the right way to handle metadata interoperability)
Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Michael Wolf Sent: Wed 12/13/2006 1:25 PM To: Florian Kainz; Piotr Stanczyk Cc: openexr-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Openexr-devel] EXIF meta data attributes in headers Hello, Sorry for being a bit late on the thread... On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:02:26 +0100, Florian Kainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what ?ort kind of information do you need to store? > As far as I can tell, there's quite a bit of overlap > between OpenEXR's "optional standard" attributes > and EXIF data. > > Piotr Stanczyk wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Just wandering what, if any, thoughts people have on having a standard EXIF >> typed attribute. >> I'm sure there are various implementations out there, but is it worth having >> a common one? Has anybody looked at XMP? http://www.adobe.com/products/xmp/ It may not be as common as EXIF, but it does have Adobe and the W3C behind it. Cheers, Mike _______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
