Thank you Ger, I created a new "Release_Static" configuration in VS and changed settings accordingly. Finally I linked the stuff manually together... Hope it works...
thanks for the hints... Josef Grunig On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Ger Hobbelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erm, not really, but I can see what I can do regarding that. Isn't > that hard to do really - it just takes time. > > Basic trick would be along these lines: get the vcproj files for the > DLLs in a text editor; kill the GUIDs at the top (as you are creating > different projects) and change the type code (a number) to the number > you see appearing in any static lib vcproj, then same as different > filenames. The .sln will be blown to smithereens then, so you'll have > to setup build dependencies between libs from scratch. Oh, And the > post-build lines calling the createDLL tool have to be removed from > the vcproj files as well. > > After that, it's a few rounds of building the stuff and checking all > the compiler and linker settings (including preprocessor symbols) and > making sure that the test apps actually run. > > > > Anyway, I'll see what I can do, but don't expect a result this week - > too busy with other stuff - hence the above short description how to > tackle this on your own if the need is urgent. > > Ger > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Josef Grunig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Very interesting, great contribution. >> >> Do you have also a project configuration for static lib? >> Would be very appreciated! >> >> Josef Grunig >> >> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Ger Hobbelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Got an MSVC2005 build for x64 and IA64; warning: lightly tested! >>> (CreateDLL has seen several changes, but here also: think of this as >>> beta quality today -- I mentioned I was working on this on the list a >>> few months ago and that I would post the 'updated' CreateDLL when >>> stabalized; it's getting close...) >>> >>> If you don't mind leaking edge source code, I can put an archive of >>> the stuff up on my site by tomorrow, so you can have a look if you >>> like? >>> >>> (FYI: the stuff has just entered the preliminary initial (small scale) >>> field test overhere, so expect bugs, okay?) >>> >>> Ger >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Martin Dulovits >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Did somebody succeed in building openexr and iex for x64 windows ? >>>> Can anyone post a working solution or a patched createdll.cpp ? >>>> I just get thousands of unresolved symbols no matter if i use msvc or icc. >>>> >>>> thx Dulo >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Openexr-devel mailing list >>>> Openexr-devel@nongnu.org >>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Met vriendelijke groeten / Best regards, >>> >>> Ger Hobbelt >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> web: http://www.hobbelt.com/ >>> http://www.hebbut.net/ >>> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> mobile: +31-6-11 120 978 >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openexr-devel mailing list >>> Openexr-devel@nongnu.org >>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Josef Grunig >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openexr-devel mailing list >> Openexr-devel@nongnu.org >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel >> > > > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten / Best regards, > > Ger Hobbelt > > -------------------------------------------------- > web: http://www.hobbelt.com/ > http://www.hebbut.net/ > mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > mobile: +31-6-11 120 978 > -------------------------------------------------- > -- Josef Grunig _______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
