Hi, thanks for your patch :) I already git a similar patch by Jonathan which was not sent to the list (sorry, did not see that).
Thank you very much for pointing me to the error. Thx, RSp On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Brendan Bolles <bren...@fnordware.com>wrote: > On Oct 22, 2010, at 4:21 AM, Ronny Spiegel wrote: > > > char *tmpBuf = new char[width * height * > getPixelSize(channel.channel().type) * 2]; > > buffers.push_back(tmpBuf); > > > > // calculate the address of pixel (0,0) > > char *base = tmpBuf + (getPixelSize(channel.channel().type) > * (sz.min.x - sz.min.y * width)); > > > I think your bug might be this (in patch form): > > - char *base = tmpBuf + (getPixelSize(channel.channel().type) * (sz.min.x - > sz.min.y * width)); > + char *base = tmpBuf + (getPixelSize(channel.channel().type) * (-sz.min.x > - (sz.min.y * width)); > > > Also, not sure why you have * 2 at the end of your memory allocation up > there. > > > Brendan > >
_______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
