On Apr 13, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Ger Hobbelt wrote: > http://www.mail-archive.com/openexr-devel@nongnu.org/msg00870.html > > bottom line: if you want 'static' builds, for any MSVC platform/build combo, > I suggest you convert ALL openexr projects to 'static lib'. > > As described in link above, but there's a little more to attend to to make it > work for real: > > first, you load those projects into MSVC and then for each DLL project go to > > properties > Configuration Properties > General > Configuration Type = > 'Static Library (.lib') instead of 'Dynamic Library (.dll)' > > Next, you need to remove the CreateDLL postprocess phase as that is not > needed in a static build environment: same dialog, so > > properties > Configuration Properties > Build Events > Post-Build Event. > > There you have to tread a little carefully as you ONLY want to remove the > CreateDLL invocation, not the file copying, etc. (or you'll have to tweak the > dependent projects to point at the new libs, which, now that I think about > while typing this quickly, /might/ be a good thing to do, though would > require one to always include the openEXR vcproj's in their own larger > projects -- an approach which I always do myself, but not everyone does it > like that. Anyway...) --> > remove any lines in there that invoke CreateDLL (these may be long and DO > MAKE SURE to click that [...] edit button right next to the line showing > those commands as the post section has multiple commands and you only want to > edit a few in each.
Indeed this recipe works well. We have used something similar to create static builds for all libraries with VS2005 and VS2008. --Wayne > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Simon Smith <si...@lightmap.co.uk> wrote: > On 13 Apr 2011, at 15:20, Paul Miller wrote: > > On 4/8/2011 3:27 PM, Simon Eves wrote: > >> On 64-bit, Half and Iex build, but both IlmThread and Imath complain > >> that Iex.lib is corrupted. DependencyWalker, on the other hand, is > >> quite happy with both Half.lib and Iex.lib. > >> > >> Needless to say, this is rather confusing... > >> > >> If anyone can tell me the right incantatation to get IlmBase 1.0.2 and > >> OpenEXR 1.7.0 converted to static build, I will buy them a beer (if > >> within a ten mile radius of SF). > > > > Simon - I don't think I ever got that to work right. I ended up linking the > > EXR source directly into my app (well, plugin really). > > Same here too. I gave up in the end and just compile all the code into my app > directly through a couple of vcproj's for the OpenExr and ILM codebases. > > Simon. > _______________________________________________ > Openexr-devel mailing list > Openexr-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel > > > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten / Best regards, > > Ger Hobbelt > > -------------------------------------------------- > web: http://www.hobbelt.com/ > http://www.hebbut.net/ > mail: g...@hobbelt.com > mobile: +31-6-11 120 978 > -------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Openexr-devel mailing list > Openexr-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
_______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
