On Thu, 19 May 2011, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2011 16:50:44 -0500 (CDT), you wrote:
Both git and Hg have been moving along nicely and have large
followings. Hg seems to be better supported under Windows with a nice
GUI (e.g. TortoiseHg) and inuitive GUI access seems important for many
Windows users.
git also appears to have a GUI for windows, tortoisegit, though I
haven't used it:
http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/
The source repository shows that TortoiseGit has been under a quick
pace of continual development since November 2008.
The download package size seems similar to TortoiseHg.
Here are some top comparison articles about Mercurial vs GIT, some of
which are quite enlightening:
http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/Git_vs_Mercurial
http://felipec.wordpress.com/2011/01/16/mercurial-vs-git-its-all-in-the-branches/
http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis
http://rg03.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/mercurial-vs-git/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/35837/what-is-the-difference-between-mercurial-and-git
The good news for projects which delayed switching from CVS is that
now there is considerable experience to be gained from projects which
switched earlier.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
_______________________________________________
Openexr-devel mailing list
Openexr-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel