This is true of Alembic as well. Versioning them the same is A-OK with me, though.
-----Original Message----- From: openexr-devel-bounces+asuter=ilm....@nongnu.org [mailto:openexr-devel-bounces+asuter=ilm....@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Alex Forsythe Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:58 PM To: Christopher Horvath; Piotr Stanczyk Cc: openexr-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Openexr-devel] Future versions: (WAS: RE: OpenEXR 1.7.1 release) CTL requires IlmBase but doesn¹t require OpenEXR so having IlmBase as a standalone package seems pretty important. You might want to consider moving IlmBase and PyIlmBase into a separate repository or repositories as they kind of feel like their own projects. Alex Alexander Forsythe - Imaging Engineering Manager - Science and Technology Council --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences - Tel 310-247-3000 x3310 Fax 310-247-3611 - www.oscars.org - aforsy...@oscars.org On 7/31/12 3:49 PM, "Christopher Horvath" <blackenc...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hey Piotr, > > >I think this is a really good idea, and in fact, I really think they >should be combined into a single package. It's perfectly reasonable to >just not link against libraries you don't need - but by having them >separate, it implies that you can mix & match OpenEXR > versions and IlmBase versions, which obviously you can't. You could >even have: > > >--disable-openexr >--disable-pyilmbase > > >in the autoconf stuff for people who didn't have tiff or jpeg installed >and didn't want build errors. > >On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Piotr Stanczyk ><pstanc...@ilm.com> wrote: > >Hi All, > >I am thinking about standardising on a single version for the different >components that make up OpenEXR. >Thus, for the next v2 release we would have > >OpenEXR v2.0.0 >IlmBase v2.0.0 >PyIlmBase v2.0.0 >etc > >Any strong feeling about this approach? > > >Piotr > > >________________________________________ >From: openexr-devel-bounces+pstanczyk=ilm....@nongnu.org >[openexr-devel-bounces+pstanczyk=ilm....@nongnu.org] > on behalf of Piotr Stanczyk [pstanc...@ilm.com] >Sent: 31 July 2012 15:36 >To: openexr-devel@nongnu.org; >openexr-annou...@nongnu.org >Subject: [Openexr-devel] OpenEXR 1.7.1 release > > >Tuesday, July 31st, 2012 > >OpenEXR v1.7.1 has been released and is available for download. >Tarballs can be obtained from the downloads section on github: >https://github.com/openexr/openexr/downloads ><https://github.com/openexr/openexr/downloads> > >This release includes the following components: > > OpenEXR: v1.7.1 > IlmBase: v1.0.3 > PyIlmBase: v1.0.0 (introduces a Boost dependency) > OpenEXR_Viewers: v1.0.2 > >Please see the Changelog for additional information in each of the >modules. > > >For the developer community: The master branch in git hub has been >tagged as v1.7.1. > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Openexr-devel mailing list >Openexr-devel@nongnu.org >https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel > > > > > > > > >-- >I think this situation absolutely requires that a really futile and >stupid gesture be done on somebody's part. And we're just the guys to do >it. > _______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel _______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
