Assuming C++11 is being used for the "tr1" stuff that boost provides, the big dependency that's difficult to shake is boost::python. It's absolutely wonderful for what it does, elegant and lightweight. I've tried swig as an alternative, and it's okay, but boost::python is definitely nicer.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Richard Addison-Wood <rich...@wetafx.co.nz>wrote: > Personally, I would recommend avoiding any dependencies on boost. > > > On 18/08/12 11:41 AM, Piotr Stanczyk wrote: > > Hi, > > Out of interest, what boost version are people using most commonly? Anyone > hitting the dizzy heights of 1.50? > > Cheers, > > Piotr > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openexr-devel mailing list > Openexr-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel > > -- I think this situation absolutely requires that a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part. And we're just the guys to do it.
_______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
