That would be great! Here are a few I found from "reputable" sources that presumably have seen a lot of use. It would be good to look them over and synthesize the best ideas into a canonical one that is as simple and robust as possible so nobody is tempted to modify it downstream.
Intel: https://github.com/embree/embree/blob/master/common/cmake/FindOpenEXR.cmake <https://github.com/embree/embree/blob/master/common/cmake/FindOpenEXR.cmake> NVIDIA texture tools: https://code.google.com/p/nvidia-texture-tools/source/browse/trunk/cmake/FindOpenEXR.cmake <https://code.google.com/p/nvidia-texture-tools/source/browse/trunk/cmake/FindOpenEXR.cmake> Blender: https://github.com/dfelinto/blender/blob/master/build_files/cmake/Modules/FindOpenEXR.cmake <https://github.com/dfelinto/blender/blob/master/build_files/cmake/Modules/FindOpenEXR.cmake> OpenSceneGraph: https://github.com/dfelinto/blender/blob/master/build_files/cmake/Modules/FindOpenEXR.cmake <https://github.com/dfelinto/blender/blob/master/build_files/cmake/Modules/FindOpenEXR.cmake> > On Jan 23, 2016, at 12:37 AM, Ashley Whetter <ash...@awhetter.co.uk> wrote: > > I've already implemented a FindIlmBase and FindOpenExr in this pull request: > https://github.com/openexr/openexr/pull/167 > Because ilmbase and openexr are built with cmake though, it's supposed to > export itself as a package that can be used by find_package instead. I > started an implementation of this earlier this week to replace the Find files > in that pull request but not had time to finish it yet. > As you're asking about it I'll make this a priority and try and get it > finished asap. Because you're right, it's difficult to know what's best with > no standard version. > > Ashley > From: Piotr Stanczyk <mailto:piotr.stanc...@gmail.com> > Sent: 23/01/2016 07:19 > To: Larry Gritz <mailto:l...@larrygritz.com> > Cc: openexr-devel@nongnu.org openexr-devel@nongnu.org > <mailto:Openexr-devel@nongnu.org> > Subject: Re: [Openexr-devel] FindIlmbase.cmake & FindOpenEXR.cmake > > I see your point ... google seems to come back with quite a few, alas. I can > see from the OIIO thread its not as easy as could be. > > I've logged an issue here : https://github.com/openexr/openexr/issues/176 > <https://github.com/openexr/openexr/issues/176> > > Thanks > > -Piotr > > > On 22 January 2016 at 23:10, Larry Gritz <l...@larrygritz.com > <mailto:l...@larrygritz.com>> wrote: > These don't seem to be a standard bit of cmake yet, and so countless > divergent approaches to them can be found across a wide number of projects. > Just google "FindIlmbase.cmake". > > Is there any consensus on the best one? (It sure as heck isn't mine, which I > think is the single ugliest one that I've found yet, I'm embarrassed to say, > and I'd like to replace it and pretend my current one never existed.) > > It would be great if a particularly good one was incorporated into the > ilmbase/openexr distribution itself as the canonical one that everybody could > use. > > -- > Larry Gritz > l...@larrygritz.com <mailto:l...@larrygritz.com> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openexr-devel mailing list > Openexr-devel@nongnu.org <mailto:Openexr-devel@nongnu.org> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel > <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel> > -- Larry Gritz l...@larrygritz.com
_______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
