FWIW, my main impetus for pointing out PR #155 is that it's the smallest possible patch to make Windows successfully compile.
I don't mean to judge other's contributions one way or another, only trying to find the quickest possible way to get the build back on line - much better to start integrations from something that works and tests okay, is what I was thinking. Also I should point out that I don't hold write access to the repo, I only offer opinions based on having spent years maintaining portions of the code, especially the Windows build, while I was at ILM, in the hope that those opinions are helpful. - Nick ________________________________________ From: Kevin Wheatley <kevin.j.wheat...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 2:16 AM To: Nick Porcino Cc: Ed Hanway; Karl Rasche; openexr-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Openexr-devel] Speaking of PRs... FWIW, my build is based on https://github.com/KevinJW/openexr/tree/develop which also includes the Foundry's Nuke patch, plus a few tidy ups, can't remember if I sent in pull requests for everything, though I think I did. Kevin _______________________________________________ Openexr-devel mailing list Openexr-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
