2007/5/16, Paulo Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Perhaps. I took a picture that I can upload somewhere, if you want to
see it.

@Stefan: Can you provide pmarques people.openezx.org and svn access?

Doh! I forgot to mention that for this test I applied both
e680-mci.patch and a780-mci.patch.

As you configured the kernel as EZX_E680 you now know that it doesnt use the
same bits to power it up as e680 ;)

Ok. We use the same machine ID for all ezx phones, right? I checked at
arm.linux.org.uk and there is only one entry that I could find for
"motorola ezx phone".

Yes, its true. We are thinking about registering more machine ids. But we
need to know how different the phones really are. Stefan is doing some
research about this. I do prefer one machine id for each phone.

Hope not. Are there any news about motorola releasing the 2.4 kernel
source for the E6? That might help if I get desperate trying to figure
out how some hardware detail works...

Ive heard they are working on the final scrub for it. You can start with the
e2 or a1200 kernel until it is released.


> * Discover which pcap bits power up your SD card (if any)
Kernel source might help here too... :(

Do I need to open up the phone to check the power on the SD power pin? I
wasn't really planning on disassembling it so soon.

Kernel source is the best way. Its also possible to inject some code
on 2.4kernel to read the pcap registers and look for diferences when
the card is
in and out of the slot. I do not recommend disassembling your phone, its too
new :)


Again, kernel source would be useful... at least some of this stuff is
controlled by the PXA270 itself and we have datasheets for that, right?

Yes, the UDC is controlled by the pxa, emu deals with routing the mini usb
port pins. Without emu you cannot reroute then and cant be sure they are
routed to the pxa udc.

--
EOF

Daniel Ribeiro

Reply via email to