Em Dom, 2008-11-16 às 00:59 +0100, Stefan Schmidt escreveu: > Hello. Hi!
> In preparation for a patchset for the next merge window I would like to get > some > feedback. Daniel and others, looking at our tree I think the following could > be > prepared and sumbmitted for review and inclusion: > > The easy one: (Linear dep on what is already upstream) > ezx/removefixup > ezx/mach/gpio > ezx/mach/keypad (Antonio, like to change to the androif scheme or not?) > ezx/mach/i2c > > One the above ones I expect nothing that will bring trouble, right? Yes, those are trivial and shouldn't be any trouble. > pxa/sparsemem > Daniel, is this upstream ready? No, this is not meant to be sent upstream. Eric will eventually add the patch himself. I dont want to be responsible for breaking all others boards as it seems that sparsemem dont work correctly if the board uses a single memory bank (tmzt couldnt get it to work with [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the motoq). > ezx/defconfig > Need to split out the stuff that is not in the set. Will take care of this > > ezx/mt9m111-fix > Antonio, you handle this already with v4l, right? > > asoc/pxa-ssp > asoc/pxa2xx-ssp > Daniel, is pxa2xx-ssp obsolete with pxa-ssp? Yes, and pxa-ssp is already on Takashi's tree, should appear on Linus tree on the next merge window. We still need a fix on this driver, i will submit the fix to alsa-devel later. > > ezx/pcap > We give this another try. Daniel, can you shed some light into which other > pateches depend on this one and which also need ezx/local/pcap? > > The local patch conatins things for the pcap that are not upstream ready yet I > guess. That means of course we can not submit patches that depend on features > only in this patch. Nothing depends on features added by ezx/local/pcap. Actually, ezx/local/pcap contains only the unfinished adc_battcurr control and the regs debug interface. We can submit patches which are up of ezx/local/pcap without any problem. When submitting this patch, cc it to spi-devel too. > ezx/asoc Not ready. > ezx/pcap_leds Ok. > ezx/pcap_ts Ok. > ezx/mach/camera ao2? As i see we can move this patch down the stack, it looks good, the only reason i see to hold it for the next merge window is that it still depends on upstream fixes on pxa-camera and mt9m111. > ezx/mach/mci Ok. > ezx/mach/pcap Ok. > ezx/mach/pcap_leds Ok. > ezx/mach/pcap_ts Ok. > ezx/mach/udc Not ready. > Some of the above are just on top of other patches in the linear patchstack on > ezx.c means we could think about moving them down a bit and submit them also. > > ezx/pcap_rtc > ezx/mach/pcap_rtc > ezx/eoc > ezx/bp > ezx/mach/bp > motoq/mach > motoq/machtype > Not ready. These are not ready for upstream. -- Daniel Ribeiro
