Hello. On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:17, Daniel Ribeiro wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Stefan Schmidt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Back to the topic that shows me that you are not interested in having such a > > patch. I'm well aware that you are the driving force in OpenEZX for a long > > time > > while myself is getting in-active more and more. > > > > That leaves me two options a) let the issue open or b) kick my ass and > > prepare > > such a patch myself. I think you would not have a problem with such a patch > > as > > long as it lifes in his own branch which ezx/current has no default dep on? > > Of course i would not have a problem with this.. But note that this is > not the right way to go, you know that you have less and less time to > maintain openezx (same with me), and thats why you should focus the > "no patches out of mainline" approach.
And that is what I'm doing all the time. This is the only case where I ever voted for having a local patch. And it is only because I think it is a critical point to depend on a modified bootloader for suspend and resume functions. But we will not change our minds here I think. The technical facts are clear and our thinking, too. We both have our points. If I, or someone else, will come up with a patch is another question. > My goal is to let users > download the ezx kernel source code from www.kernel.org, not from > git.openezx.org :) My goal is to give them something ready to flash that is build rom kernel.org, and more important some software on top that makes it a useable phone. :) regards Stefan Schmidt
