On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:10 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:38 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > The syntax may seem strange, > > > > It does! > > > > > but basically it just says "don't let me by y if RFKILL is m" > > > > ... but, besides that, I can be any value. So in effect it's shorthand > > for > > depends on RFKILL=y || RFKILL=m && m || RFKILL=n > > > > (which actually looks equally strange). Is that correct? > > I don't think it is, I believe that an expression like "RFKILL=y" has a > bool type, and a tristate type value that depends on a bool type can > still take the value m.
Err, which is of course perfectly fine since if RFKILL is built in this can be any value, and in the RFKILL=m case you force it to m by making it depend on m directly. So yes, you're right. johannes
