I just want to clarify this portion of the message.  Redhat Enterprise
Linux is enterprise, as you can get enterprise level support by buying a
subscription.

That having been said I would not consider deploying a home-grown
storage solution on RHEL to be a supportable storage solution for an
enterprise.  That's why large companies purchase EMC and Netapp.

Sure, you might have a superstar sysadmin that knows how to make RHEL
run circles around a Netapp, but what happens when that guy steps in
front of a bus tomorrow?

I guess you have to look at this from the enterprise perspective.  A
supportable solution from an enterprise perspective means it can be
deployed almost anywhere in the world (a large financial institution
customer of ours has offices/data centers in every continent except
Antarctica) and hardware or software can be fixed by competent engineers
no matter where that might be.  EMC offers this, but you do pay a
premium for it.

When you start looking at the enterprise support offerings provided by
EMC and Netapp, among others, you soon realize that the hardware cost is
negligible compared to TCO.  EMC, Netapp, and other companies like them
are selling storage as a "service", not as hardware.  You pay them X
dollars a year and they provide you with a storage service, fully
supported, replacing drives and other parts as they fail.

Most people might look at those that buy EMC and Netapp and think
"they're crazy/stupid to waste their money."  Those that have had to
provide 99.999% uptime to a mission critical banking application realize
that the support cost is a bargain compared to the amount of money lost
due to loss of service, even for a short amount of time.  When you are
talking about losing $millions per hour that the application is down,
$200,000 a year for support is really a drop in the bucket for peace of
mind.

I'm not sure where OF will fit in with this model.

I can see your point in that third-party support vendors will rise to
meet the demand.  As an OF user, I would welcome that.

Regards,
Luke

-----Original Message-----
> This is why a packaged and supported hardware+software solution is
enterprise, but a Linux distro that you can load on generic beige-box
hardware and create a mini-SAN out of is not.
> 

Hence you're saying Red Hat Enterprise Linux is -not- an enterprise
product according to your definition?

_______________________________________________
Openfiler-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openfiler.com/mailman/listinfo/openfiler-users

Reply via email to