On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:29 AM, kk yap <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Wang, > > cc-ing the mailing list for expert advices from those who knows better. > > git://gitosis.stanford.edu host the reference implementation. > Honestly, I don't think that would be maintained. Moreover, OpenFlow > 1.1 is already released, and there is no implementation for OpenFlow > 1.1 in that reference implementation. The only 1.1 compatible > software switch out there is OVS and ofps. As for which is the > appropriate codebase to work on, I would let others advice on that. > Rob, can you comment on ofps?
ofps is a fine place to _prototype_ your thoughts, but it is an incomplete openflow switch implementation (if you're interested in what's missing, please let me know). It was not designed for any sort of performance (it's written 100% in python), so once you're done prototyping, you will likely want to move on to something else. To underscore KK's point, there is not really an obvious, common OpenFlow 1.1 switch code base for you to work on. - Rob . _______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
