Hello,

The new flowvisor does not yet have this feature, but it's on the
short list of things for me to do ASAP.

You can follow the progress at:

https://openflow.stanford.edu/bugs/browse/FLOWVISOR-81

- Rob
.



On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:03 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Yiannis,
>
> I was really confusing the subjects. Now I understood the parameter
> priority.
>
> Just another question. I think that in the old version of FlowVisor I could
> configure a Bandwidth parameter. I was thinking that priority parameter has
> replaced it. Is there some parameter to add a simple QoS mechanism like
> bandwidth in FlowVisor?
>
> Thank you.
>
> My best regards.
>
> Luciano Ignaczak
>
> Citando Yiannis Yiakoumis <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi Luciano,
>>
>> I think you are confusing priority of a flow-entry with QoS-related
>> priority.
>> Priority will define which flow-entry the incoming packets will match. In
>> your case, traffic that goes to tp_dst=5060 matches both slices
>> definition,
>> but it belongs (and therefore controlled) by the one with highest
>> priority.
>> It doesn't have any impact on the rates these flows will achieve.
>>
>> For this you might want to look at min-rate queues :
>> http://www.openflow.org/wk/index.php/Slicing
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yiannis
>>
>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:26 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I´d like a little help to know if I understood correctly the use of
>>> priority parameter on a FlowSpace.
>>>
>>> I created a topology and divided it in two slices: voice and data. After
>>> this I configured two FlowSpaces on each switch following the examples
>>> below:
>>> fvctl addFlowSpace <MAC> 10000 "tp_dst=5060" "Slice:voice=4"
>>> fvctl addFlowSpace <MAC> 1 any "Slice:data=4"
>>>
>>> When I was reading "man fvctl" I understood that the priority parameter
>>> determines the priority of the flow. However, during my tests with Iperf
>>> I
>>> have got better results with the data´s slice.
>>>
>>> Am I using correctly the parameter priority?
>>>
>>> I used mininet + NOX + flowvisor in my tests.
>>>
>>> Best regards.
>>>
>>> Luciano Ignaczak
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openflow-discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openflow-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
openflow-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss

Reply via email to