On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:07:31AM -0700, Rob Sherwood wrote: > 2011/10/17 huyn <[email protected]>: > > Is there other kernel module OpenFlow implementations besides OVS? > > > > If not, can we use OVS to test the PC-based OpenFlow Switching performance? > > Or should we implement a pure kernel module OpenFlow Switch ourselves?? > > The stanford reference switch has a kernel implementation, but it was > deprecated with the 1.0 version. There was an attempt to update the > kernel version to 1.0 and I'm not sure how far it got, but IMHO, if > you're interested in performance, you should just use OVS.
I agree, but my reading of huyn's message is that he wants to avoid OVS. huyn, is that true, and if so, why is it the case? Thanks, Ben (one of the authors of OVS). _______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
