On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Dan Talayco <dan.tala...@bigswitch.com>wrote:
> First, note that the precision with which durations are reported is in > nano-seconds in flow stats and expiration messages. This provides support > for more accurate measurements using this info. > > There has not been much of a call for increasing the granularity of > time-out settings below 1 second. Are you considering using timeouts of > less than a second on flows? > Zoltan politely pointed me to these: https://www.opennetworking.org/bugs/browse/EXT-86 https://www.opennetworking.org/bugs/browse/EXT-57 > -Dan > > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> Hi Team, >> >> Is there any specific reason / restriction to keep the idle_timeout & >> hard_timeout values to second level granularity and not milli/micro/nano >> seconds? >> >> >> Anil >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openflow-discuss mailing list >> openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss >> >> >
_______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
