Thanks for the quick reply Zoltán. I think it would be good to have it better pointed on the spec. Some values, like OFPQ_ALL, fall in the same difficulty to infer the value. (by the type of the field one can infer the value of the constant will be always something like 0xffff, for a 16 bit field for example, but i think it could be better specified).
Eder. On 14 June 2012 11:18, Zoltán Lajos Kis <zoltan.lajos....@ericsson.com>wrote: > ** > Hi, > > It is 0xffffffff as before, only now it has a name. > > Z. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* openflow-discuss-boun...@lists.stanford.edu [mailto: > openflow-discuss-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] *On Behalf Of *Eder Leão > Fernandes > *Sent:* Thursday, June 14, 2012 4:08 PM > *To:* openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu > *Subject:* [openflow-discuss] OFP_NO_BUFFER value > > Hi, > > What is the value of OFP_NO_BUFFER? The specification says that when a > packet is not buffered the buffer_id have this value, but I couldn't find > it anywhere in the specification. > > May I have to assign that value by myself? > > Best Regards, > Eder. > > -- > Eder Leão Fernandes > > Bacharel em Ciências de Computação > Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação > Universidade de São Paulo > > -- Eder Leão Fernandes Bacharelado em Ciências de Computação Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação Universidade de São Paulo
_______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
