On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Murali <chris.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rob/Daniel > > Thanks for the quick response. I was looking at flowvisor as I was planning > to integrate the concept of ports slicing into one of the network processor > platforms. I'm looking at C++ as an option (not C in particular) although I'm > not too sure how much successful will that be, but to begin with I don't have > JVM ready on that platform. So its a question of getting JVM ready vs > converting > FV to C++ (preferably) which I'm stuck up at.Your valuable suggestions will be > greatly appreciated.
Both porting a JVM to a network processor platform and rewriting flowvisor to C++ seem like a lot of work. My inclination would be porting a JVM to the platform would be less work, but honestly without more details, I'm just not sure which is easy. Unfortunately, I don't know what to tell you other than best of luck :-/ Hopefully through this mail, you might find someone else who would be interested in such an effort and they might reach out to help. Please let me know what you decide. - Rob . _______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
