Hi, thanks for response Just to specify : I want my switch (which is a "router" in this case) responds to ARP request concerning only its ip Address (like it has to do)
2013/3/4 Luca Prete <luca.pr...@garr.it> > Hi! > > If you have a table con the controller with some records ip -- mac addr > you can intercept broadcast arp request with the packet in message and > answer with a unicast packet out to the machine witch generated the request > (arp reply) > > Of course you COULD install a flowmod on the switch but it would be > unusefull because arp request anyway would change every time, host by host. > > Anyway usually on the controller topology and device manager modules > should help you ;) > > Luca P. > > Il giorno 04/mar/2013, alle ore 07:46, Arnaud M <arnau...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > Hi everyone, > > I did the first part of this (great) tutorial and now i'm in the routing > part and i'm wondering few things : > > 1 - why do we need 2 switch for this topology ? one should be enough right > ? > 2 - In the switching part, one didn't care about ARP reply/request... but > here in routing mode we should, so here is my question : how do you craft > ARP reply ? In the controller after a packet In message by sending a packet > out message to the switch ? Or is there a way to push a flow that would > match the ARP request and with actions would send an ARP reply ? > 3 - What about ARP request ? When one need to replace ethernet > destination... the controller should do it by using a packet out ? > > Thanks for your help > > Arnaud M > > _______________________________________________ > openflow-discuss mailing list > openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
