Thanks for pointing this out. openflow.org will be directed to the ONF site soon, but the content will continue to be available as an archive. I'm not sure contents will be updated before archiving, so we may need to revisit this.
-Dan On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan < vdhar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I agree. www.openflow.org still points to 1.1.0 spec while ONF shows > 1.3.2. > > Thanks > dharani > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:39 PM, IanB <porj...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > >> Could whoever maintains the openflow.org website please remove the old, >> outdated information and links, or at least setup a robots.txt to stop the >> site being indexed. >> >> Google searches are turning up pages from this site with hopelessly >> out-of-date information (e.g. HP switch support for Openflow). Newcomers >> seeking to find out more about Openflow may be left with the impression >> that it is a dead project. >> >> Ian. >> ______________________________**_________________ >> openflow-discuss mailing list >> openflow-discuss@lists.**stanford.edu<openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu> >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/**mailman/listinfo/openflow-**discuss<https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > openflow-discuss mailing list > openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
