I haven't seen any followup on this besides Nick's message, but I expect it 
would make sense to keep the existing #openflow channel on freenode and just 
document that it exists somehow so that people can find it (I added a link on 
the openflow.org wiki at least.)

Either I wasn't aware of the #openflow channel or I had forgotten about it (I 
also don't really use IRC), and I expect I'm not the only person in that 
position.

Ali, do you think it makes sense to create another IRC channel or just to use 
the existing #openflow channel?

-Bob

On Jun 6, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Nicholas Bastin <nick.bas...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jun 6, 2013 8:03 PM, "Ben Pfaff" <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> > There is, or at least was, an #openflow channel in active use on
> > freenode.  Did it disappear?  Why create a new channel?
> 
> It still exists with light but steady traffic.
> 
> --
> Nick
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openflow-discuss mailing list
> openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss


On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 06:05:01PM -0700, Ali Al-Shabibi wrote:
> We (Open Networking Laboratory) are announcing an IRC channel where
> OpenFlowers like you can meet up and help each other out. The channel
> can be found at:
> 
> IRC Server : irc.freenode.net
> Channel : #openflow-discuss


_______________________________________________
openflow-discuss mailing list
openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss

Reply via email to