What might cause confusion (if there is any) is that the original OF 1.0 implementation provided extension messages - OFP_EXT_QUEUE_MODIFY and OFP_EXT_QUEUE_DELETE - for managing queues. See e.g.,: http://yuba.stanford.edu/git/gitweb.cgi?p=openflow.git;a=blob;f=utilities/dpctl.c;h=0406d9b5f21557a9450bd573755d17319723a3ea;hb=HEAD#l247
Regards, Zoltan >-----Original Message----- >From: openflow-discuss-boun...@lists.stanford.edu [mailto:openflow- >discuss-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] On Behalf Of Ben Pfaff >Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 4:53 PM >To: Carlos Ferreira >Cc: Wes Felter; openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu >Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] Fwd: QoS with Openflow Switches > >On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:59:55AM +0000, Carlos Ferreira wrote: >> My issue is not regarding the type of QoS I want to do. It is how can >> I, via Openflow, configure for example, a leaky bucket with a specific >> leak rate. > >You cannot. OpenFlow does not provide any way. >_______________________________________________ >openflow-discuss mailing list >openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu >https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss _______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
