Thank you for your answer Zoltan. I'm actually working with OF1.4.

I don't see a reason to not add acknowledgment messages. Increase of
complexity is not really a good excuse simply because, yes the protocol may
be simpler but the software implementation complexity increases.

I hop this changes in the future. I would also like to contribute with
proposals but I don't know how, without paying to become a ONF member.


On 6 May 2014 13:07, Zoltán Lajos Kis <zoltan.lajos....@ericsson.com> wrote:

>  Hi Carlos,
>
>
>
> I definitely agree with you that a positive acknowledgement is needed in
> OpenFlow; especially since the introduction of groups (and meters). In fact
> I made a proposal more than two years ago in ONF for this feature. Some
> were objecting it, as it would add complexity to the protocol, or as
> barriers can already provide similar function. So this feature never got
> into the specification.
>
>
>
> My guess is that most people are still using OpenFlow in an OF 1.0 style,
> and so are fine without acknowledgements of any sort. Now that we are
> getting more and more OF 1.3 features supported in both controllers and
> switches I hope people will start using those features and realize the need
> for a light-weight positive acknowledgements.
>
>
>
> For now you can use barrier request/reply after messages to get the
> acknowledgment, or in OF 1.4 you execute one or more messages within a
> bundle.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Zoltan
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* openflow-discuss [mailto:
> openflow-discuss-boun...@lists.stanford.edu] *On Behalf Of *Carlos
> Ferreira
> *Sent:* Monday, May 05, 2014 7:35 PM
> *To:* openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
> *Subject:* [openflow-discuss] OFP_FLOW_MOD response from OF Switch to
> Controller.
>
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Can anyone explain me why is that in the specs, there are error messages
> specified to respond to a bad configuration but, there is no specification
> for a simple OK of ACK message for a good configuration.
>
> Is there a good reason or a good programming principle for not specifying
> OK responses for successful configuration operations?
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Carlos Miguel Ferreira
>
> Researcher at Telecommunications Institute
>
> Aveiro - Portugal
>
> Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt
>
> Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com
>
> LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira
>



-- 

Carlos Miguel Ferreira
Researcher at Telecommunications Institute
Aveiro - Portugal
Work E-mail - c...@av.it.pt
Skype & GTalk -> carlosmf...@gmail.com
LinkedIn -> http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosmferreira
_______________________________________________
openflow-discuss mailing list
openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss

Reply via email to