[Re-sending to list due to using wrong email address.]

I'm not sure where the best forum is for NetFPGA. However, I know a lot of 
people that work on that project at least used to be on this one. 

--Justin


> On Mar 24, 2017, at 8:36 AM, HENRYDOSS, JAMES <jd5...@att.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Justin,
> 
> I do use a NetFPGA 1G card for setting up the Openflow Switch 1.0 version in 
> a LINUX PC.
> 
> I am unable to ping the machine after completing the installation 
> successfully.
> 
> Which forum deals with this and who will provide me some support on this.
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> James Henrydoss
> Principal Member Technical Staff  I AT&T OC&ATS,
> 404-345-2524 (m) I  404-499-6986 (o)  email: jd5...@att.com 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openflow-discuss [mailto:openflow-discuss-boun...@mailman.stanford.edu] 
> On Behalf Of jpet...@cs.stanford.edu
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 2:30 AM
> To: Pravin <pravi...@altencalsoftlabs.com>
> Cc: openflow-disc...@mailman.stanford.edu
> Subject: Re: [openflow-discuss] ACL entries flow
> 
> 
>> On Mar 8, 2017, at 10:00 PM, Pravin <pravi...@altencalsoftlabs.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Team,
>> I am testing acl flows in open flow.
>> I have used a combination of ethertype, vlan and ingress port as qualifiers 
>> to perform 'write actions'. This is successful.
>> But when I tried to use DST IP instead of ethertype, I am facing the 
>> following error, For eg, ovs-ofctl -O OpenFlow12 add-flow br0 
>> in_port=1,dl_vlan=1,nw_dst=12.12.12.1/32,table=60,action=group:65538
>> error:
>> 2001-04-24T17:26:47Z|00001|ofp_util|INFO|normalization changed ofp_match, 
>> details:
>> 2001-04-24T17:26:47Z|00002|ofp_util|INFO| pre: 
>> in_port=1,dl_vlan=1,nw_dst=12.12.12.1
>> 2001-04-24T17:26:47Z|00003|ofp_util|INFO|post: in_port=1,dl_vlan=1
>> 
>> Do we have any document that advises valid qualifiers combinations/lists?
>> I have searched the curl commands also internet for open flow acl commands, 
>> but in vain.
> 
> You need to specify "ip".  It's mentioned in the FAQ:
> 
>       
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openvswitch_ovs_blob_master_Documentation_faq_openflow.rst&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Exkz0jJqFsvC-cKU1sHFNA&m=nXzZDoT_HR2sojavl371vDFS41tHJ4GAq9LkWO7zY7E&s=T7GZTBVbMSUkUatiQgwoksltHj5PCBDAEMge8CYgzNw&e=
>  
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Q: I ran ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 nw_dst=192.168.0.1,actions=drop but I got a 
> funny message like this:
> 
> ofp_util|INFO|normalization changed ofp_match, details:
> ofp_util|INFO| pre: nw_dst=192.168.0.1
> ofp_util|INFO|post:
> 
> and when I ran ovs-ofctl dump-flows br0 I saw that my nw_dst match had 
> disappeared, so that the flow ends up matching every packet.
> 
> A: The term "normalization" in the log message means that a flow cannot match 
> on an L3 field without saying what L3 protocol is in use. The "ovs-ofctl" 
> command above didn't specify an L3 protocol, so the L3 field match was 
> dropped.
> 
> In this case, the L3 protocol could be IP or ARP. A correct command for each 
> possibility is, respectively:
> 
> $ ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 ip,nw_dst=192.168.0.1,actions=drop
> 
> and:
> 
> $ ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 arp,nw_dst=192.168.0.1,actions=drop
> 
> Similarly, a flow cannot match on an L4 field without saying what L4 protocol 
> is in use. For example, the flow match tp_src=1234 is, by itself, meaningless 
> and will be ignored. Instead, to match TCP source port 1234, write 
> tcp,tp_src=1234, or to match UDP source port 1234, write udp,tp_src=1234.
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 
> --Justin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openflow-discuss mailing list
> openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailman.stanford.edu_mailman_listinfo_openflow-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Exkz0jJqFsvC-cKU1sHFNA&m=nXzZDoT_HR2sojavl371vDFS41tHJ4GAq9LkWO7zY7E&s=eG0b3GPtdHV9wuzeygql6z7O9LBR1_s1ulwXPKu2Z4A&e=

_______________________________________________
openflow-discuss mailing list
openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss

Reply via email to