So with 5 yes (+1) votes - we do not need to wait for the remaining 2 votes - and this vote carries.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Edward Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Kamal Rameshan (kramesha) < > krame...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> Hi , >> >> My vote is Yes. >> >> Thx >> Kamal >> >> >> From: <openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org> on behalf of >> Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> >> Date: Monday, February 1, 2016 at 10:22 PM >> To: "openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org" < >> openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> >> Subject: [openflowplugin-dev] Request for a vote from the OFP committers >> on recommending Li design for Be SR 1 >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I today's meeting it was suggested that we should have a vote for the >> committers for the following question as not all committers were present >> during the meeting: >> >> Shall OF Plugin recommend dependent ODL projects to all move to Li plugin >> design in the Be SR 1 timeframe? >> >> Please vote: yes, no or neutral >> >> BTW - my vote is yes >> >> Reason for this question is for OFP to concentrate development resources >> on a single plugin design. >> >> Thanks, >> Abhijit >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openflowplugin-dev mailing list >> openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org >> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev >> >> >
_______________________________________________ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev
